Guitar Hero 3

by **eXp3rt_** » Tue 07-Oct-2008, 08:31:53

I just got it today (along with a wii), and i must say its addicting! although i cant complete any songs on medium, i have mastered the easy songs >;)

Do any of you guys have the game? and do u have any tips for me?

p.s. what games are cool for the wii. i heard super smash bros brawl is pretty awesome so i purchased it with my parents money, any other games?

by **Crusading Knight** » Tue 07-Oct-2008, 12:34:55

I don't see what others see in Guitar Hero 3.

by **DragonQ** » Tue 07-Oct-2008, 12:54:48

I would guess entertainment?

by **Drag** » Tue 07-Oct-2008, 20:28:26

why get gh3.... gh4 is coming out in like a couple weeks iirc

by **XpT_TwiLiGhT** » Tue 07-Oct-2008, 20:33:24

i can highly recommend resident evil 4

resident evil 5 comes out soon but i dont know if its for the wii also

by **DragonQ** » Tue 07-Oct-2008, 21:19:32

XpT_TwiLiGhT wrote:i can highly recommend resident evil 4

Truth.

XpT_TwiLiGhT wrote:resident evil 5 comes out soon but i dont know if its for the wii also

Nope. Utter kick in the balls after RE4, a GC exclusive (at first), was so utterly uber.

by **Wylde** » Tue 07-Oct-2008, 21:32:54

Brawl is great, but

me and dragonq are too pro.

by **eXp3rt_** » Tue 07-Oct-2008, 22:20:29

whats resident evil. its sounds scary

by **DragonQ** » Tue 07-Oct-2008, 22:55:31

Google exists for a reason, as does Wikipedia.

by **Wylde** » Wed 08-Oct-2008, 02:21:15

lol ckmodist

by **eXp3rt_** » Wed 08-Oct-2008, 03:13:35

maybe i dont want to use google, and would rather hear the opinion of you guys? hence me asking it in a forum ~lol~

by **Jean-Paul Fartre** » Wed 08-Oct-2008, 04:42:44

you asked a factual question to answer with an opinion wouldnt be proper ettiquette

My Zune Profile · by **Saffy** » Wed 08-Oct-2008, 05:58:45

cos i could say its a game like the sims but mixed in with a bit of violence

thats not true

by **eXp3rt_** » Wed 08-Oct-2008, 05:59:35

i will not listen to you until you stop listening to retarded music that homeless people like

by **Jean-Paul Fartre** » Wed 08-Oct-2008, 06:14:24

what do you have against homeless people?

you are a terrible person from whati have gathered you hate transexuals, gays, the disabled and the poor this forum is a tolerant society go back to stormfront with your asinine opinions

by **Wylde** » Wed 08-Oct-2008, 06:23:17

USA! USA!

by **eXp3rt_** » Wed 08-Oct-2008, 08:43:59

says the person who called lightmare a dirty jew 11

hey all i have against the homeless is the bad music they like
i looked that up on google

the disabled? i feel sorry for the disabled are u on crack? did u not pay attention to that one thread with pictures of that stuff.

of course i have something against gays. its disgusting

and i have nothing against the poor. my parents were poor when they were kids

by **Jean-Paul Fartre** » Wed 08-Oct-2008, 08:47:58

eXp3rt_ wrote:says the person who called lightmare a dirty jew 11

this is a fabrication

of course i have something against gays. its disgusting

que?

by **eXp3rt_** » Wed 08-Oct-2008, 10:05:55

fabrication? no i will not look it up. im too lazy to and im proud of saying im not that smart

the only way to reproduce and care for a child is having 2 oposite sexes attract

i think its like this for a reason, and thats why a guy and a guy cant reproduce, because it wasnt meant to be so they shouldnt even be together

plus its grody to the max, so idk why people would be like that

by **Jean-Paul Fartre** » Wed 08-Oct-2008, 11:03:09

you are proud of being not smart? you take pride in ignorance? you are everything that is wrong with the world, all of the opportunity you have wasted by anti-intelectualism while people are starving. you seriously disgust me go kill yourself please.

also "ment to be" is not logic at all and i will not accept it as a point in any arguement

also the only way to care for a child is to feed then and clothe them and not drop them on they head having 2 people is in no way important to the development of a child, in fact having a large group of adults looking after a kid will help to expose the child to more intrests earlier which helps in the growth of the brain and memory so i would say that having a 2 people of opposite sexes is not vital at all for child rearing and also the sole purpose of a relationship is not to reproduce it can be for passion or whatever also bleeding out your crotch all the time is pretty fuckin grody so in conclusion your a big ignorant bigot jackass who doesnt deserve life

by **Jean-Paul Fartre** » Wed 08-Oct-2008, 11:03:45

you know who else hated gays and wanted to preserve traditional family values?

:hitler:

by **Jean-Paul Fartre** » Wed 08-Oct-2008, 11:05:41

its you, you are hitler. there is no valid reason to disparage gays but you seem to think that your disagreement with them should bar them from a the pretty universal right that is child rearing and i would much rather have 2 gay men or 2 gay women watching a child than having it live in orphanages

by **Wylde** » Wed 08-Oct-2008, 21:31:08

its you, you are hitler

LOLGIC.

wtf most girls ik are totally for gay marriage.

WTF IS THIS

There is NO way expert is a girl.

by **A Political Junkie** » Wed 08-Oct-2008, 23:40:58

ATB_WyldeOne wrote:
its you, you are hitler

LOLGIC.

wtf most girls ik are totally for gay marriage.

WTF IS THIS

There is NO way expert is a girl.

A=C
D=B

OH SHIT E=H

by **eXp3rt_** » Thu 09-Oct-2008, 03:48:27

@wylde
you stereotype and therefore make no sense

@jean
studies have shown a couple who has a pleasant marriage raises a kid better, because the kid grows up seeing a happy relationship between a female and a male, and from seeing their parents happy, they become happier adults which makes them optimistic

"also bleeding out your crotch all the time is pretty fuckin grody so in conclusion your a big ignorant bigot jackass who doesnt deserve life"

that does not make sense and is also irrevelant so ill ignore it

i would rather have a kid in orphnage until a good family takes them in

gay couples should not have the right to raise a child becasue then the child will think being gay is right and it teaches that that if they were a boy they should also loves boys

also i agree with hitler about preserving family traditions and i am against gay couples, but where did i say i agreed with him on how every person who's skin was not white should be sent to a concentration camp

that is illogical, since u seem to love logic so much

by **Jean-Paul Fartre** » Thu 09-Oct-2008, 04:36:14

i didnt say that you advocated concentration camps, also children of gay parents are not anymore likely to be gay than children of straight parents and if you have a study cna you please link to it instead of saying "studies show" because 1. lots of very biased people do studies of questionable scientifice merit and 2. studies show that you are a bad poster

by **Crusading Knight** » Thu 09-Oct-2008, 08:18:28

I agree with eXp3rt_, gays do not make good parents and should not have the right to care for children. Their wicked ways should not be tolerated. It is unnatural and counter productive. I would rather have a child in an orphanage than in a gay household as well.

if you have a study cna you please link to it

Please don't be so ignorant.

by **eXp3rt_** » Thu 09-Oct-2008, 08:44:53

Jean-Paul Fartre wrote:children of gay parents are not anymore likely to be gay than children of straight parents

if you have proof can you please link to it

by **Crusading Knight** » Thu 09-Oct-2008, 08:58:56

the pretty universal right that is child rearing

It is not a right for gays to care for children. Is it our right to breath under water? No. Why not? Because we can't.

by **Jean-Paul Fartre** » Thu 09-Oct-2008, 09:47:56

Crusading Knight wrote:I agree with eXp3rt_, gays do not make good parents and should not have the right to care for children. Their wicked ways should not be tolerated. It is unnatural and counter productive. I would rather have a child in an orphanage than in a gay household as well.

let he who is without sin cast the first stone

by **A Political Junkie** » Thu 09-Oct-2008, 13:10:32

Crusading Knight wrote:I agree with eXp3rt_, gays do not make good parents and should not have the right to care for children. Their wicked ways should not be tolerated. It is unnatural and counter productive. I would rather have a child in an orphanage than in a gay household as well.

Go to hell CK.

by **Jean-Paul Fartre** » Thu 09-Oct-2008, 14:13:31

eXp3rt_ wrote:also i agree with hitler about preserving family traditions and i am against gay couples, but where did i say i agreed with him on how every person who's skin was not white should be sent to a concentration camp

yo do you know why hitler hated jews and other assorted people? for the same reason you do its human nature to for tribes and to fear and hate people from other tribes (basically anyone different) which in this case is gay people and probably a little bit more its just that its a whole lot easier nowadays to admit to hating gay people than it is to say how much you hate asians or blacks or whatever. in the next 30-40 years it will be considered as abhorant to think that gays shouldnt be allowed to raise children as it is now to say that blacks shouldn't raise children

by **DragonQ** » Thu 09-Oct-2008, 15:40:39

Jean-Paul Fartre wrote:yo do you know why hitler hated jews and other assorted people? for the same reason you do its human nature to for tribes and to fear and hate people from other tribes (basically anyone different) which in this case is gay people and probably a little bit more its just that its a whole lot easier nowadays to admit to hating gay people than it is to say how much you hate asians or blacks or whatever. in the next 30-40 years it will be considered as abhorant to think that gays shouldnt be allowed to raise children as it is now to say that blacks shouldn't raise children

My Zune Profile · by **Saffy** » Thu 09-Oct-2008, 16:10:22

studies prove that its not neurture (if its spelt like that) that makes people gay, its biological.
I saw one thing on TV:

2 boy twins, they shared a bedroom, but they had different sides to their bedroom, one had loads of guns and stuff (like an ondinary boy) the other had barbies and horses you groom and stuff.
They lived with their mum ( dont know about dad), their mum wasnt very feminin, she never wore skirts or anything, but she new that her son would be gay.
She said that from when he was a bout 1 year old, he prefered the colour pink to blue, so its not neurture, so gay parents will most likly not make their child gay

by **Crusading Knight** » Thu 09-Oct-2008, 17:43:07

She said that from when he was a bout 1 year old, he prefered the colour pink to blue, so its not neurture, so gay parents will most likly not make their child gay

Perhaps, but the child will be more tolerant regarding gays, which is unacceptable.

JaZz wrote:
Crusading Knight wrote:I agree with eXp3rt_, gays do not make good parents and should not have the right to care for children. Their wicked ways should not be tolerated. It is unnatural and counter productive. I would rather have a child in an orphanage than in a gay household as well.

Go to hell CK.

God will decide.

by **Jean-Paul Fartre** » Thu 09-Oct-2008, 17:48:40

Crusading Knight wrote:Perhaps, but the child will be more tolerant regarding gays, which is unacceptable.

God will decide.

thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself

by **Crusading Knight** » Thu 09-Oct-2008, 17:53:56

That does not mean let people sin.

by **Jean-Paul Fartre** » Thu 09-Oct-2008, 17:57:15

no but it means to forgive them and tolerate them

by **Crusading Knight** » Thu 09-Oct-2008, 17:58:58

Not if they ignorantly continue sinning.

by **Jean-Paul Fartre** » Thu 09-Oct-2008, 18:00:45

ummm ya dude, jesus forgives fuckin everything havent you heard

also catholic doctrine w/r/t ignorance was that jesus forgives that too iirc

Who is online